Sl Favourite – Audio Reviews https://www.audioreviews.org Music for the Masses. Sat, 16 Apr 2022 20:34:15 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0 https://www.audioreviews.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/cropped-avatar-32x32.jpeg Sl Favourite – Audio Reviews https://www.audioreviews.org 32 32 KZ ZS7 Review – Onwards And Upwards https://www.audioreviews.org/knowledge-zenith-zs7-review/ https://www.audioreviews.org/knowledge-zenith-zs7-review/#comments Tue, 12 Mar 2019 21:41:23 +0000 https://www.audioreviews.org/?p=2507 ...though the ZS7 is more fun and is a definite step-up from its predecessors. Recommended.

The post KZ ZS7 Review – Onwards And Upwards appeared first on Audio Reviews.

]]>
Knowledge Zenith ZS7—absolutely dominant in the ultra-budget space, KZ has faced some headwinds in its journey upmarket, as their ambitious multidriver hybrids have been criticized for their piercing treble and new comparably-priced entrants like BQEYZ, Tin and TRN have cranked out more refined, better-tuned phones. Ergo the ZS7, which undoubtedly responds to critics of the ZS5 and ZS6 by toning down the treble and improving the aesthetics. 

Headshells themselves have a reassuring heft and appear to be well-built, with nice even seams and smooth metal casings, although the visible screws look a bit declassee. Tangly but serviceable memory cable appears identical to the ZSN’s; microphonics are present but mild. Fit and comfort are better than the oddly-shaped ZS5 or ZSR; isolation isn’t as good as the ZS4 or ZSN, but still surprisingly capable despite large top vents. Unlike the ZS5, which absolutely needed amping, the ZS7 is extremely efficient and are easily driven to “insanely loud” levels with just a mobile—these should be the Audiobudget guy’s wet dream. More lavishly packaged than previous models, though the slogan on the box, “Don’t forget. The original intension (sic) is use headphones to enjoy music” does not seem like a good expenditure of KZ’s PR budget.

KZ ZS7 content

Soundwise, these are slightly warm, energetic and very spacious-sounding, with a rich note texture. Signature is balanced, in the (technical) sense of not unduly emphasizing a particular frequency, though by no means audiophile flat—there’s a certain adrenalized quality throughout the spectrum, though less so than the hyperfrenzied ZSN. Low end has good extension, depth and impact and shows much better control and speed than the bloomy ZS5 or ZSR, which tended to bleed over into the higher frequencies—midbass in particular has less quantity and focus than the ZS6, resulting in a cleaner presentation. Midrange (especially lower mids) sounds full and forward; guitars and male vocals in particular have a lot of body, albeit with a “chesty,” heavy quality on some material. As noted, treble is noticeably less extended here and these have little of the sharpness and shrillness of the ZS5/ZS6, although the ZS7 rolls off sooner and presents less information (they’re also less exhausting); there’s some sparkle but drums and cymbals lack just a little snap and realism. Soundstage isn’t as wide as the ZS5 or ZSR but nonetheless uncongested, enveloping and 3D; the effect is closer to open-air headphones. As with most KZs, imaging and instrument placement are excellent for this price class. While not seamless, driver coherence is much better on these than the ZS5 or ZSR; bass in particular is better-integrated and there are fewer audible peaks and dips.

Where these trail the Andromedas and other pricy universals they’re aping is in the naturalness of the presentation and reproduction of low-level details like fingertips and reverberations–you remain conscious of hearing a reproduction of instruments rather than the actual instruments. Owing, I’d assume to the quality of the drivers used, the subtlest elements are somewhat repressed; compared to something the UE900s, these sound artificially juiced and slightly coarse. These differences may not be cost-effective if, like me, you typically listen to lossy files on less-than-optimal sources, and lots of times one prefers this less delicate presentation. In the same price range, the smaller-sounding Bosshifi B3 or BQEYZ BQ3 may sound more accurate, though the ZS7 is more fun and is a definite step-up from its predecessors. Recommended.

Disclaimer: Although I pay or trade for virtually all my IEMs, I received these unsolicited and free from Yinyoo Amazon. Photos by Slater.

KZ ZS7 earpieces

The post KZ ZS7 Review – Onwards And Upwards appeared first on Audio Reviews.

]]>
https://www.audioreviews.org/knowledge-zenith-zs7-review/feed/ 1
KZ ZSN Review – Good Cheap Fun for Philistines https://www.audioreviews.org/kz-zsn-review/ https://www.audioreviews.org/kz-zsn-review/#respond Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:38:06 +0000 http://www.audioreviews.org/?p=2363 Very likeable $15 hybrid really does justify most of the gushing praise, with a rich, bright tonality and  a lot of

The post KZ ZSN Review – Good Cheap Fun for Philistines appeared first on Audio Reviews.

]]>
Very likeable $15 hybrid really does justify most of the gushing praise, with a rich, bright tonality and  a lot of PRAT. Aesthetics are improved over prior models, with nice-looking metal face and a good quality braided cable; headshells are large and heavy but sleekly designed and comfort is much better than the bulbous ZS5/ZSR/ZS10.

Isolation is good if not as exceptional as the ZS3/ZS4.

Very sensitive and loud; V-shaped with voluminous, impactful bass which can bleed over and thump a bit, tho in a pleasant way. Mids are thick textured and less forward, which makes vocals and keyboards sound farther back while treble is sparkly and clear, though not especially detailed—there’s nothing analytical about these.

Instruments are well separated and stage is wide but not noticeably high or deep; effect is like listening in a large, low-cielinged hall.  Like KZ’s other hybrids, these are not paragons of accuracy; high end can sound metallic or harsh on certain material.

I prefer the more neutral tuning of the ZSR, and the ZS5/ZS6 presents more information, especially at the high end, but the ZSN is livelier than either and  preferable for rock and jazz. Stepping up in price, the TRN V80 or BQEYZ BQ3 are more refined, with significantly better-tuned bass, but the ZSN is more coherent and less fatiguing  than the V80 and more user-friendly than the fiddly BQ3. Viscerally very pleasing overall and something of a benchmark at this price point.


MEASUREMENTS

KZ ZSN frequency response
KZ ZSN and KZ ZS4 frequency responses

The post KZ ZSN Review – Good Cheap Fun for Philistines appeared first on Audio Reviews.

]]>
https://www.audioreviews.org/kz-zsn-review/feed/ 0
Tinaudio T2 Review – Unparalleled In Its Class https://www.audioreviews.org/tinaudio-t2-unparalleled-in-its-class/ https://www.audioreviews.org/tinaudio-t2-unparalleled-in-its-class/#respond Tue, 22 May 2018 06:51:24 +0000 https://www.audioreviews.org/?p=149 Pros — Build, neutral sound; vocals reproduction Cons —  May be somewhat cool sounding for the unsophisticated ear. Not for

The post Tinaudio T2 Review – Unparalleled In Its Class appeared first on Audio Reviews.

]]>

Pros — Build, neutral sound; vocals reproduction

Cons —  May be somewhat cool sounding for the unsophisticated ear. Not for bassheads.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Tinaudio T2 is a very popular rugged dual dynamic-driver earphone with a neutral tuning that is unparalleled in its price category. Vocals are particularly well reproduced.


INTRODUCTION

I’ve had the Tinaudio T2 for 1⁄2 year at the time of this review. I had paid $33 on sale, the regular price at the time of this review is around $49. One of the housings’ MMCX cable contact got loose after 4 to 5 months so that Tinaudio sent me a replacement through my seller Jim from NiceHCK store after I had contacted them via their Facebook page. I promised to write a quick review in gratitude for the excellent customer service by both Tinaudio and NiceHCK store. My opinion of the T2 earphones had existed prior to this exchange. I tend to call a spade a spade, am skeptical towards window dressing, and won’t beat around the bush. I don’t believe in burn-in/break-in for tens to hundreds of hours and also don’t subscribe to bogus cable-sound discussions. For audio testing, I consult a cross section of music while making sure to include enough naturally produced sounds such as voices and string/wood instruments.

You can read about the unboxing experience and the accessories or view fancy photos in other reviews. This is not relevant (for me) and would be repetitive at best.

In my selection of over 60 earphones, the T2 stick out in that they are built sturdily and have a relatively flat sound signature. The earpieces feature a minimalistic industrial design reminiscent of theBauhaus, and they are made of metal and are attached to the cable by MMCX connectors. This has the (questionable) advantage that the cable can be rotated around the contact but such contacts are prone to failure – even in the most expensive earphone. 2-pin connectors are much more reliable and I had recommended Tinaudio to implement these. The braided cable including the straight 3.5 mm audio jack is rather fancy. The haptic of both earpieces and cable is impeccable.

The earpieces with the included largest-size, wide-bore rubber tips fit my ears well. The cable can be worn around the ear or under the ear. I drove the T2 easily with my iPhone 5S.

Tinaudio T2 frequency response

TONALITY

In terms of sound signature, whereas most earphones in this price category and below have a V- shaped frequency response curve with somewhat weak mids/vocals hidden between dominant bass and treble, the T2 offers more prominent vocals in comparison. Some see a downside in this and block the bass vents with blue tack in order to increase the bass – which drives “audiophiles” up the tree. There is nothing wrong with a somewhat realistic sounding bass, which is actually one of the T2’s strong sides. The bass is just fine for me.

The mids are the strongest point of the T2. Voices are well rendered and natural sounding without any sibilance.

Treble is not piercing and cymbals and hi hat are well resolving.
Soundstage is not the biggest, image is class average and reasonably airy, instrument separation,

resolution, and layering are good. The timbre is a bit on the cool and bright side. Clarity, transparency, and detail are ok. There is no real overall weakness in the tonality.


CONCLUDING REMARKS

In conclusion, this is a good sounding and comfortable earphone for people who like a neutral tonality and well reproduced vocals, independent of price. And it is well worth its money. In fact, it has developed into one of the most-liked earphones in its category. The only comparable neutrally tuned, similarly priced earphone I knew were the discontinued Fostex TE-02. If you prefer a warmer and fuzzier sound, I’d point you to the Tinaudio T1 or the Fidue A65.

I recommend reading the many qualified T2 reviews found on Head-Fi and other blogs such as the contraptionist, aproar, primeaudio, and elsewhere to get the broad body of opinions on the Tinaudio T2.

P.S. NiceHCK store asked me to add a product link to the Tinaudio T2 after reading the above review. Here it is!

The post Tinaudio T2 Review – Unparalleled In Its Class appeared first on Audio Reviews.

]]>
https://www.audioreviews.org/tinaudio-t2-unparalleled-in-its-class/feed/ 0